{"id":"W2592188807","doi":"10.4236/jmf.2017.71011","title":"An Explicit Solution for a Portfolio Selection Problem with Stochastic Volatility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Finance","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Economics; Stochastic volatility; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Risk aversion (psychology); Mean reversion; Portfolio optimization; Asset (computer security); Brownian motion; Capital asset pricing model; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370562,0.0008804653,0.0009041275,0.0005323752,0.0004098419,0.001461401,0.0007462736,0.00281601,0.004431026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005625796,0.0004931457,0.0008071001,0.0005327762,0.000862487,0.00157846,0.001473945,0.001778509,0.0002937809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000741307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001438007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002146334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001461646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994932,0.0002258968,0.00002211416,0.00009618321,0.00009333125,0.00006914577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986477,0.001029622,0.000104329,0.00003532585,0.0001171012,0.00006592215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005457915,0.0001005737,0.0008443898,0.0002200515,0.00005295646,0.0002914132,0.0001406563,0.6801587,0.002040382,0.2960667,0.002125542,0.01790397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002210638,0.00002480805,0.0001329203,0.00001982416,0.00001130559,0.00004787535,0.00002868083,0.9505675,0.0002127746,0.04775517,0.001167271,0.000009768895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02988623,0.0007020936,0.9583465,0.00142661,0.0001127761,0.00006172237,0.00008012668,0.00004621646,0.009337767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7012788,0.001446654,0.2745852,0.0004737886,0.0002733353,0.0004195143,0.0002399152,0.0001000063,0.02118269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004431026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01482332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03576415510088465,"score_gpt":0.2696765751260504,"score_spread":0.2339124200251658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}