{"id":"W2592741824","doi":"10.1186/s40463-017-0194-2","title":"Measuring Cochlear Duct Length – a historical analysis of methods and results","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","topic":"Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universities Space Research Association","keywords":"Cochlear duct; Cochlea; Computer science; Visualization; Cochlear implantation; Measure (data warehouse); Cochlear implant; Artificial intelligence; Biomedical engineering; Data mining; Medicine; Audiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005484304,0.0002931598,0.004110748,0.001579422,0.0002201006,0.00004553357,0.0002296558,0.0004228289,0.000006310507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01210546,0.000209253,0.001109871,0.000486216,0.0002849237,0.0002165386,0.0001012089,0.0007580276,9.519682e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001346634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004849335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002761994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950519,0.001825674,0.002116831,0.0004507909,0.0002690409,0.0002857197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895774,0.006897007,0.002760537,0.0004018298,0.0001458524,0.0002173425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002672352,0.0002677229,0.005265989,0.009551818,0.001182951,0.0003911055,0.0003462477,0.000002765824,0.001203161,0.00007437023,0.000454032,0.9809926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004302647,0.000391407,0.1143491,0.007536434,0.004421365,0.001450544,0.000005074103,0.00004212379,0.0000579726,0.00005503069,0.8708471,0.000413525],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2198548,0.7790991,0.00003295284,0.0001298438,0.000661121,0.0001277519,0.00001164175,0.000007013675,0.00007570451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005890279,0.9927748,0.001025107,0.00002504624,0.000159271,0.000003846491,0.000002072214,0.00002381564,0.00009573521],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.233254108025171,"score_gpt":0.4165202284528672,"score_spread":0.1832661204276962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}