{"id":"W2592772899","doi":"10.5751/es-09154-220133","title":"Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Adaptation (eye); Risk governance; Public relations; Political science; Business; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002429563,0.00006348344,0.0001084825,0.000003143211,0.0005097429,0.0000158575,0.0000502824,0.00009281591,0.00006957869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003244534,0.000065412,0.00001922616,0.00001332712,0.0008055529,0.0001908482,0.0002620475,0.00008550131,6.793765e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001942093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000335536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003686007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994967,0.00001698477,0.0000952833,0.0001884997,0.00007397187,0.0001285758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996831,0.000106608,0.0001364042,0.00005549532,0.000001067171,0.00001730571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000792805,0.00005185721,0.9724194,0.00003275544,0.00001121639,0.00000468832,0.01753855,0.00001630851,0.0007905847,0.003560388,0.00003441634,0.005460498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004478477,0.00003472461,0.9745867,0.000018645,0.000007290038,0.000003212509,0.01536203,0.0008610094,0.00003735818,0.008511732,0.00006150953,0.0000679556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982661,0.00007022006,0.0001532224,0.00009223346,0.00002327349,0.0001404206,0.00001284198,0.000002721431,0.00123897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988506,0.000552191,0.0004971225,0.00005775615,0.000009535325,0.0000120669,6.559425e-7,0.000003174175,0.00001687757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005392543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3920582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05977204868282646,"score_gpt":0.2703841529654386,"score_spread":0.2106121042826121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}