{"id":"W2593437695","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.044","title":"Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of influenza immunization programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Vaccine","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; AstraZeneca (Canada); Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Vaccination; Immunization; Health care; Cost effectiveness; Population; Checklist; Influenza vaccine; Environmental health; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Family medicine; Pediatrics; Demography; Immunology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002917779,0.0003831095,0.005701713,0.0001724366,0.0001108901,0.00001201413,0.0007279986,0.0001830461,0.00001999508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008568223,0.0001875578,0.0008850311,0.0006054395,0.00006325142,0.0000602641,0.0004299014,0.0004180706,0.00002434945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001855336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005003422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003498563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001890738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960186,0.001202385,0.001606254,0.0002554536,0.0006637634,0.0002535138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937928,0.0005617128,0.002202494,0.002297584,0.001087993,0.00005744914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002232817,0.00008988778,0.00007878349,0.9241275,0.001048262,0.000002197177,0.00001321615,5.823399e-8,0.000001602156,0.00004984376,0.00005127633,0.07451501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004490953,0.0001194859,0.0001332704,0.7996692,0.005100721,0.00002447735,0.00000312109,5.739717e-7,0.00001345927,0.000003121127,0.1943764,0.0001070378],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003913122,0.979426,0.000004585331,0.00001388853,0.0001037759,0.01996827,0.00003087131,0.00002033534,0.0004283271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001180973,0.9978876,0.00001929131,0.00004709492,0.00003892412,0.001715676,0.00005602232,0.00005293431,0.0001706507],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1943251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2484853670406687,"score_gpt":0.493814065969273,"score_spread":0.2453286989286043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}