{"id":"W2593531585","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.02.002","title":"Similar sentences, similar crimes? Using deep sample analysis to examine the comparability of homicides and punishments by victim-offender relationship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of law, crime and justice","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminology; Jurisdiction; Psychology; Comparability; Punishment (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Intimate partner; Sample (material); Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Domestic violence; Political science; Law; Medicine; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01266857,0.0005238081,0.00117075,0.00203111,0.001166991,0.002424398,0.001190399,0.0008740958,0.003465397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07172766,0.0003310923,0.001332898,0.001482551,0.001686834,0.003231091,0.002992934,0.0020705,0.0003516841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004435591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000588064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003750108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004351938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986572,0.007929233,0.001055591,0.002405523,0.001248924,0.0007887679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243881,0.05901517,0.004843328,0.008023462,0.002213503,0.001516483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002985624,0.0006461911,0.9235201,0.0001548346,0.004430563,0.0005428553,0.005578812,0.0009934865,0.005239412,0.00328193,0.001546545,0.05107946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002127556,0.002091203,0.9322019,0.00007258824,0.002238259,0.001062614,0.01105863,0.03257437,0.001982014,0.01415882,0.002253879,0.0000930082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991413,0.00009032049,0.007227789,0.000185828,0.00004207878,0.00005350021,0.000268598,0.00002845933,0.0006904136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980822,0.00001521414,0.001325197,0.00005234258,0.00002337307,0.00003366717,0.0002952409,0.00001618027,0.0001566394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01266857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06699866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08673390960549647,"score_gpt":0.4025281097177932,"score_spread":0.3157942001122968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}