{"id":"W2593570975","doi":"10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1690","title":"Evidentially Compelling Religious Experiences and the Moral Status of Naturalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Naturalism; Philosophy; Irrational number; Epistemology; Vision; Judgement; Falsity; Negation; Natural (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Theology; History; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007863542,0.0001454642,0.0002888901,0.00009805142,0.0003604435,0.00004965614,0.0002877433,0.00002215994,0.00003299428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001200696,0.00007252166,0.0002220524,0.00002202371,0.001608117,0.0002173968,0.00004794868,0.0001404538,0.000006412754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007712466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001701244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001898415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003384114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986552,0.0002615861,0.0005343374,0.000145239,0.0001874995,0.0002161507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986004,0.0003767722,0.0005481636,0.0001615192,0.0002316134,0.00008153272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001177925,0.00002235728,0.00004332868,0.0000383288,0.00007762234,0.000007832829,0.03294335,0.000003808823,0.0001916414,0.9621156,0.00175984,0.001618404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004176627,0.0009285407,0.00005237445,0.0006256592,0.0001068902,0.00006690378,0.001370877,0.00001319104,0.0005096629,0.9257488,0.06617907,0.0002214534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8768626,0.03013705,0.0003865753,0.01212782,0.003215063,0.0004583213,0.00004868662,0.00004238934,0.07672147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932551,0.004789884,0.000168574,0.0001825143,0.001272925,0.000002429246,0.00000131019,0.00001948037,0.0003077317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1163925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0392273651092703,"score_gpt":0.2485795163526655,"score_spread":0.2093521512433952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}