{"id":"W2593578526","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0173361","title":"A meta-analysis of home range studies in the context of trophic levels: Implications for policy-based conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Trophic level; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Herbivore; Conservation biology; Conservation status; Geography; Biology; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03022538,0.001788242,0.007503337,0.008836406,0.0005157593,0.003458308,0.002390402,0.002029359,0.004465492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08917489,0.0007654133,0.01016706,0.009106208,0.0008966856,0.003276542,0.001594434,0.002263267,0.0003580499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002466815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004303719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01157181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863476,0.007408482,0.003190812,0.001294065,0.00148706,0.0002719556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8730859,0.1118428,0.007735606,0.00269672,0.003947435,0.0006913781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000635196,0.00004283742,0.008961456,0.5606059,0.179408,0.0003679287,0.0003020421,0.0009022787,0.0003806895,0.00305679,0.007588817,0.237748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003238028,0.0003073376,0.02342962,0.3415082,0.5535522,0.000740038,0.0004951262,0.0005739063,0.0004533098,0.01066409,0.06784578,0.0001065578],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000401754,0.9980641,0.0003601894,0.0006930732,0.0001550905,0.00002342723,0.000112246,0.000007188493,0.0001828422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02648369,0.9689794,0.00208333,0.001451171,0.0003882228,0.0001545724,0.0002867324,0.00001934181,0.0001535573],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03022538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.159849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6676211406317032,"score_gpt":0.4229847423638292,"score_spread":0.244636398267874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}