{"id":"W2593715458","doi":"10.1002/ece3.2841","title":"Oxygen and carbon isoscapes for the Baltic Sea: Testing their applicability in fish migration studies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Otolith; Environmental science; Oceanography; Baltic sea; Habitat; Spatial variability; Isotopes of carbon; Spatial ecology; Isotope analysis; Stable isotope ratio; Dissolved organic carbon; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Biology; Geology; Total organic carbon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002863095,0.0002642729,0.0001384059,0.0008768105,0.0003753134,0.0004565772,0.00029396,0.0002951279,0.0004714132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004431815,0.0001317361,0.0002542492,0.0007489056,0.0003778109,0.0003525739,0.0004541432,0.0002129474,0.00008562097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004746242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003725587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01652257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01709038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992617,0.0003851292,0.00004478334,0.0001550588,0.000114641,0.00003872838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980412,0.00102743,0.000306908,0.0001986239,0.0002987926,0.0001270315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006291773,0.0002178788,0.9580786,0.00002880134,0.00009912277,0.00006535378,0.0004858249,0.004688839,0.009609384,0.0001774497,0.00008246637,0.02583718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306909,0.000954323,0.9803806,0.000006238726,0.00004052478,0.00004559749,0.0004798337,0.01528876,0.002287708,0.0001938547,0.0002793787,0.00001251383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986187,0.00001945535,0.0008550761,0.000007736639,0.000002194409,0.0000165782,0.00008061864,0.000007708462,0.0003919626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979092,0.00001398908,0.001820136,0.000004730322,0.00000138271,0.00002895522,0.0001417007,0.000003029543,0.00007670756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01652257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03285283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02290732879556579,"score_gpt":0.2608190777927138,"score_spread":0.2379117489971481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}