{"id":"W2593938775","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2016-0215","title":"A risk-based approach to winter road surface condition classification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; North Dakota Department of Transportation","keywords":"Adverse weather; Index (typography); Road surface; Aggregate (composite); Environmental science; Risk assessment; Collision; Transport engineering; Computer science; Meteorology; Statistics; Engineering; Civil engineering; Mathematics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002331425,0.001603615,0.001536167,0.005751988,0.0008167583,0.002441365,0.002337443,0.001079876,0.001681886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00476052,0.000447266,0.001678251,0.002940775,0.0006367174,0.001852692,0.001516301,0.001655403,0.000523894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001207405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007995041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005925946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973411,0.0005436483,0.0002576641,0.0005845813,0.001061335,0.0002116907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978218,0.0007034938,0.0004150099,0.0002323813,0.0007161721,0.0001110982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002300589,0.0006146994,0.04133767,0.0002899217,0.0004838966,0.000535491,0.0006307366,0.4106058,0.01120704,0.03542316,0.005624305,0.4930172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001012768,0.0001388214,0.0113249,0.00005517521,0.00008776521,0.0002855479,0.0002411403,0.9507003,0.00253476,0.03037751,0.004174634,0.00006929293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02378923,0.0006039179,0.9713925,0.0002670413,0.00006257811,0.0001472529,0.0006067365,0.0004499376,0.002680818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5173846,0.000781255,0.4750409,0.0001326565,0.0002725428,0.000309623,0.002080888,0.0001233219,0.003874141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007995041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01589704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009927988772464048,"score_gpt":0.2028675658795941,"score_spread":0.19293957710713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}