{"id":"W2594006143","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.77","title":"The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Unilateralism; Argument (complex analysis); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Principal–agent problem; Sociology; Moral hazard; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Politics; Incentive","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03655142,0.0006847904,0.001200467,0.001615539,0.004194485,0.009242509,0.002865184,0.008306147,0.006679101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03995352,0.0008225612,0.001557833,0.001476242,0.03520815,0.01806297,0.01320012,0.01437611,0.000890718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005279598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005530348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001360078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670323,0.01993664,0.001430402,0.003535181,0.006709458,0.001356014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634315,0.01961531,0.003274968,0.006062325,0.005936389,0.001679558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000245292,0.000003234577,0.0000495863,0.000007208406,0.000002457659,0.00001298329,0.0001400806,0.0001948072,0.0000259031,0.9984322,0.0002456828,0.0008833533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005207529,0.000003849265,0.00003283894,0.00002021857,0.000003560626,0.00002443474,0.00007855186,0.001430214,0.00005131668,0.9956286,0.002716828,0.000004420795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02439537,0.001260779,0.7067021,0.06746753,0.0007784876,0.0001272419,0.00006908416,0.0001001287,0.1990993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233508,0.0007020289,0.06207965,0.004210051,0.0008089899,0.0003012668,0.00003258429,0.00007660819,0.008438052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03655142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1933047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06799479555579228,"score_gpt":0.2714001653646418,"score_spread":0.2034053698088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}