{"id":"W2594012331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027","title":"Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Respondent; Climate change; Public economics; Climate policy; Opposition (politics); Turnover; Sample (material); Political science; Survey data collection; Public policy; Business; Environmental resource management; Politics; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003387017,0.0000516719,0.000147503,0.00003040963,0.0006626258,0.00007074018,0.0003623113,0.00006150509,0.000904642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003762242,0.00004719104,0.00007393311,0.00001046401,0.0001857343,0.0001627865,0.0001322348,0.0000400864,0.00003145769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001078524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003514562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001380082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002509982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994983,0.00003147524,0.0001634284,0.000100164,0.00002338984,0.0001832465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.0001565643,0.0001683844,0.000255328,0.00003123744,0.00006113531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070065,0.000301146,0.05507096,0.00005298149,0.00003228465,3.526737e-7,0.009840676,0.00003693819,0.0001164639,0.7626721,0.0003146901,0.1714544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680071,0.0002219505,0.7903236,0.00001191089,0.00001656141,2.933887e-7,0.003304851,0.0003882795,0.0001045976,0.01927118,0.1854393,0.000237443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8838809,0.000002899742,0.00000846304,0.003971138,0.0002242928,0.000171414,0.00005554029,0.0000223659,0.1116629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984289,0.01474168,0.0001706068,0.00016326,0.0002526189,0.00006831149,0.00002162554,0.000004774783,0.0002881353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7434009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7367389942336753,"score_gpt":0.4722084882722747,"score_spread":0.2645305059614006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}