{"id":"W2594192496","doi":"10.1139/facets-2016-0054","title":"Assessing public commitment to endangered species protection: A Canadian case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Okanagan University College; Carleton University; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Calgary; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Endangered species; Limiting; Stewardship (theology); Property rights; Business; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental resource management; Threatened species; Private property; Public economics; Public support; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Law; Habitat; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005017747,0.0005195727,0.0004365281,0.003110911,0.00996024,0.003023399,0.001469457,0.001898196,0.003081718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01676943,0.0002963162,0.0006111381,0.008664727,0.002871126,0.001378079,0.001951965,0.001903406,0.0001532231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1098748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07014465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961312,0.0009930464,0.0001071025,0.0002291522,0.001099973,0.001439579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827575,0.006860258,0.001304479,0.0005985162,0.006693768,0.001785392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009488856,0.002060623,0.7279292,0.0007248989,0.0002987981,0.007499853,0.06147658,0.01549674,0.001297095,0.05547467,0.03528177,0.0915109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003079372,0.00043497,0.6722854,0.0006861667,0.0003440789,0.001090718,0.2383656,0.02539239,0.000948426,0.004982475,0.05488635,0.0002754477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743245,0.0005188654,0.0004294323,0.003142805,0.00001455106,0.0001777545,0.0008605986,0.000007901835,0.02052371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996262,0.0005611714,0.0009400488,0.0003213961,0.000006993942,0.00004950467,0.0003282856,0.000004866362,0.001525716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1098748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.404557288564033,"score_gpt":0.2932112233530297,"score_spread":0.1113460652110033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}