{"id":"W2594192496","doi":"10.1139/facets-2016-0054","title":"Assessing public commitment to endangered species protection: A Canadian case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; York University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Okanagan University College; Carleton University; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Calgary; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Endangered species; Limiting; Stewardship (theology); Property rights; Business; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental resource management; Threatened species; Private property; Public economics; Public support; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Law; Habitat; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004326319,0.0001002832,0.0001759883,0.0001429921,0.0008338635,0.0007010559,0.0001825221,0.00003580728,0.0008612724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000489655,0.0001237549,0.00003642042,0.00003135564,0.000028344,0.0005601021,0.00007773415,0.00007773908,0.001365944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006049046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002815872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1848151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991859,0.00001344245,0.0002520168,0.0002931107,0.00002264237,0.0002328439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991226,0.000005247027,0.0001754891,0.0004940137,0.000007242495,0.0001954401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001396003,0.000126325,0.990055,0.000004395739,0.00004799352,0.0001532264,0.001920111,0.00004867368,0.00001316878,0.001754303,0.0006844481,0.005191018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004057303,0.00008281672,0.9545988,0.000003313778,0.000003360725,0.00006727031,0.00298524,0.0002720515,0.00002121864,0.0002821554,0.04109745,0.0001805959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726521,0.00003944162,0.0003516418,0.002467991,0.0004402742,0.000685541,0.00005230455,0.00001524823,0.02329542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977031,0.00000297446,0.0001999084,0.0001558875,0.00008849866,0.0001196625,0.00000555147,0.00001344163,0.00171098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0598511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.404557288564033,"score_gpt":0.2932112233530297,"score_spread":0.1113460652110033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}