{"id":"W2594332420","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n2p256","title":"Examining of Relationship between Responsibility to Protect &amp; Sovereignty of States in Light of Practice of International Community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Human rights; Sovereignty; Humanitarian intervention; Genocide; Law; Political science; International community; International law; International human rights law; Intervention (counseling); Opposition (politics); Politics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003740523,0.00004328855,0.0002315115,0.00007928603,0.0001448526,0.00001856927,0.0002907378,0.00006263684,0.000005439104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00753063,0.00004015251,0.00004140549,0.00005591542,0.0003263445,0.0002725895,0.00008404112,0.0002418742,8.504054e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004928112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001538291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01414402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00523555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985287,0.0004865071,0.0005302668,0.00003989337,0.0003201778,0.0000945026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968948,0.001270476,0.001006474,0.0001757179,0.0005858463,0.00006672119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009410809,0.0001506457,0.4387511,0.0000590455,0.00003224303,8.348438e-7,0.02053167,0.00002416943,0.0001784033,0.5400963,0.00001597537,0.0000655166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005165266,0.0003564975,0.8265593,0.0003283687,0.00004695298,0.000002165213,0.01436466,0.00001228416,0.0006243517,0.152457,0.004660341,0.00007150516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760332,0.00002790399,0.00004513398,0.0010313,0.00004352208,0.00007743246,0.00006660107,6.648983e-7,0.02267422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986822,0.00002211133,0.001203806,0.00002192196,0.000030453,1.986346e-7,0.000001299082,0.000002067536,0.0000359239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3878082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08915370278836411,"score_gpt":0.3969605806360701,"score_spread":0.307806877847706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}