{"id":"W2594393013","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6536","title":"A Literature Review on the Culture of Cheating in Undergraduate Engineering Programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Cheating; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Attribution; Academic integrity; Engineering education; Process (computing); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social psychology; Engineering; Engineering management; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009219248,0.0007019917,0.0015555,0.01637575,0.001885981,0.005260344,0.001516478,0.001568849,0.003287108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0299211,0.0007336058,0.001414797,0.02574915,0.002613445,0.005246384,0.001887196,0.001984315,0.0006402581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006167559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01806793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03634025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06624119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928674,0.002597664,0.001446449,0.0006340998,0.002118231,0.0003361111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339851,0.0504833,0.00572107,0.0007825837,0.008104385,0.0009235321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001005945,0.0001170664,0.01049893,0.1551777,0.0004616267,0.0005520145,0.02324507,0.0003949634,0.0005266917,0.0124531,0.04307258,0.7533996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001883009,0.0001213459,0.0837919,0.4583537,0.001170335,0.001518093,0.04104956,0.0001622959,0.0005466666,0.002945658,0.4101972,0.0001244547],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004438229,0.9866915,0.0003319366,0.003548195,0.0003302653,0.00002991666,0.000159667,0.00001535574,0.004455067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02009066,0.9777419,0.0005141825,0.001070994,0.0001386004,0.00003647454,0.0001431379,0.000008470794,0.0002556506],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0722574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03225482653638319,"score_gpt":0.3116013859181873,"score_spread":0.2793465593818041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}