{"id":"W2594827431","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.013","title":"The social logic of naloxone: Peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Graduate Center","keywords":"Harm reduction; (+)-Naloxone; Harm; Medicine; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Opioid; Public health; Social psychology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001736202,0.0001128685,0.0003110553,0.00007281822,0.003273717,0.00003901795,0.0002895148,0.00006755938,0.00002344805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008271936,0.00005857333,0.0000795958,0.0003177517,0.009128978,0.0001900433,0.00002801323,0.000131779,0.000001061663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009145267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007277132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005336678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002252519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981367,0.00006018662,0.0003889407,0.0001633899,0.001019184,0.000231574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998685,0.00004149879,0.0004248821,0.0001748278,0.0006179742,0.00005581852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001075169,0.0002404939,0.001410735,0.0001382154,0.0001147334,0.00000154717,0.4561489,8.193375e-8,0.009731629,0.4795341,0.002713787,0.04889061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01713151,0.001075872,0.7972768,0.0001202383,0.0007844819,0.00004876748,0.1304917,0.00005621211,0.007386091,0.03740884,0.007939734,0.0002797325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5979802,0.0001716756,0.00006889236,0.380591,0.0003039792,0.0006579232,0.00001187052,0.00001600343,0.02019851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981341,0.0001013011,0.00001233789,0.0001780641,0.001170764,0.00002239931,0.000008739569,0.000005769681,0.0003665599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7958661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02911101826275889,"score_gpt":0.3788978738524874,"score_spread":0.3497868555897284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}