{"id":"W2594962321","doi":"10.4141/cjps09112","title":"Quantitative trait loci analysis of economically important traits in<i>Sorghum bicolor</i>×<i>S. sudanense</i>hybrid","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Quantitative trait locus; Biology; Hybrid; Sorghum; Trait; Genetic linkage; Plant breeding; Breeding program; Tiller (botany); Molecular marker; Genetics; Agronomy; Gene; Cultivar","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001940912,0.0003451655,0.0002394698,0.0008771653,0.0002354876,0.0002001388,0.0002618668,0.0001743411,0.000872496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001266063,0.0002268261,0.0003979017,0.0004045511,0.0001824266,0.00007740608,0.0002792844,0.0004133951,0.0001901813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003276624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000157047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003046499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998404,0.000023455,0.00001777318,0.00005732954,0.0000321519,0.00002892793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997641,0.0000578235,0.00007218983,0.00002270629,0.00002254764,0.0000606192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009698249,0.00002805209,0.00130829,0.00001531658,0.0000132258,0.00007237039,0.00004748008,0.00005537792,0.997223,0.00004477201,0.00001689542,0.001078244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001936844,0.001020849,0.5948235,0.00002541338,0.0002909591,0.00230122,0.0004623131,0.004113241,0.391042,0.0002828476,0.005338794,0.0001050761],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985875,0.00007177541,0.0007062147,0.00001756889,0.000004496615,0.00001056081,0.0003576791,0.00002226495,0.0002219777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954046,0.00008933646,0.001918558,0.00003251759,0.00000288446,0.00003135162,0.00157592,0.00002963655,0.0009152796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001885611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003749251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03493219443643727,"score_gpt":0.204459398896404,"score_spread":0.1695272044599667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}