{"id":"W2595753686","doi":"10.1039/c7nr00010c","title":"The ideal strength of two-dimensional stanene may reach or exceed the Griffith strength estimate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nanoscale","topic":"Graphene research and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zigzag; Silicene; Materials science; Graphene; Tension (geology); Stress (linguistics); Density functional theory; Ideal (ethics); Composite material; Limit (mathematics); Instability; Ultimate tensile strength; Mechanics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Computational chemistry; Mathematics; Geometry; Law; Mathematical analysis; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007536775,0.0001318335,0.0001653279,0.00002484402,0.001610196,0.000234038,0.001112286,0.00004523675,0.0002270366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000300119,0.00006123698,0.00006603103,0.00009786492,0.0006996822,0.0001216873,0.0002763652,0.0001487811,0.00008074706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000172987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008885824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983726,0.0000993701,0.0002653043,0.0002646236,0.0005784754,0.0004196029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979314,0.0004662668,0.0002262523,0.001100522,0.0001513044,0.0001242285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002362339,0.0002093746,0.001892635,0.00002006931,0.00002559737,0.000007190954,0.0001008755,0.00007511261,0.9428793,0.03002821,0.01520625,0.009319139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001629796,0.0002790795,0.05507308,0.0000772799,0.0000442996,0.00002254141,0.0001988566,0.001618613,0.9182121,0.01130403,0.01123369,0.0003066636],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944996,0.0001396872,0.00002858628,0.002872132,0.0001468863,0.000302421,0.0001694154,0.00003580062,0.001805423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970555,0.00003535085,0.00132624,0.00002348263,0.00008693837,0.00006965731,0.000008302246,0.00001337322,0.001381176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05318045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02944102578403029,"score_gpt":0.3369032435318016,"score_spread":0.3074622177477713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}