{"id":"W2595753686","doi":"10.1039/c7nr00010c","title":"The ideal strength of two-dimensional stanene may reach or exceed the Griffith strength estimate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nanoscale","topic":"Graphene research and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zigzag; Silicene; Materials science; Graphene; Tension (geology); Stress (linguistics); Density functional theory; Ideal (ethics); Composite material; Limit (mathematics); Instability; Ultimate tensile strength; Mechanics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Computational chemistry; Mathematics; Geometry; Law; Mathematical analysis; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003306571,0.0002184957,0.0002066019,0.0003274838,0.0003504413,0.0003895262,0.0003629466,0.0006004754,0.002943322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000665129,0.0002021088,0.0001422466,0.0001242126,0.0009113064,0.0008380996,0.0004594403,0.0005090228,0.0004573139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002105481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002520951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002157121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003845893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999843,0.00001388766,0.000008347082,0.00002296682,0.00007770923,0.00003409725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997174,0.0001353359,0.0000271576,0.00005028879,0.00003984512,0.00002993879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001121721,0.00007471448,0.002471909,0.0003468379,0.00003543237,0.0006295284,0.0001440519,0.01682702,0.7691084,0.1938495,0.0008051991,0.01559531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003569358,0.0004370173,0.009327442,0.0001307935,0.00003458732,0.0009059472,0.0002820493,0.09238983,0.7461279,0.1199062,0.03027691,0.0001456119],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045103,0.001814549,0.02984608,0.0008887486,0.0001613648,0.00003504403,0.0002423045,0.0001778263,0.06232377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953015,0.0003965714,0.002136276,0.00006353832,0.00001210149,0.00002113381,0.00008201098,0.00001325996,0.001973584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002943322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00984633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02944102578403029,"score_gpt":0.3369032435318016,"score_spread":0.3074622177477713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}