{"id":"W2595895685","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2016-0519","title":"Revisiting burst pressure models for corroded pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Corrosion; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Reduction (mathematics); Engineering; Materials science; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003435886,0.0006769914,0.0006407169,0.0005532736,0.0002195408,0.0005779947,0.001388863,0.0008539394,0.0007226546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009498,0.0005528466,0.0006743695,0.000277873,0.0005555247,0.0008871488,0.0004760676,0.0006420546,0.0002115295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006104122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006896868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006780529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004936287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997769,0.0000326588,0.00001727811,0.00003842177,0.0001066393,0.00002809793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996476,0.0001218835,0.00007002831,0.00003961312,0.0001082866,0.00001243979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002539961,0.00002478234,0.001483486,0.0000504993,0.00001148492,0.0001368855,0.00007898948,0.9757324,0.011315,0.002131591,0.0001881448,0.008821326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001952122,0.0000179175,0.0003158645,0.000004025289,0.000004787174,0.00002374883,0.00001037098,0.9969593,0.002053862,0.0003152184,0.0002893357,0.000003605731],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3766371,0.0006342058,0.6142414,0.0002579912,0.00005480609,0.00009527265,0.0002840962,0.0006857433,0.007109369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696116,0.0005138174,0.0261281,0.00003082169,0.00001242963,0.00006234239,0.0001302331,0.0001025967,0.003408077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006780529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01348215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01704794755328061,"score_gpt":0.2171480491195941,"score_spread":0.2001001015663135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}