{"id":"W2595895685","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2016-0519","title":"Revisiting burst pressure models for corroded pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Corrosion; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Reduction (mathematics); Engineering; Materials science; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002820718,0.0001611474,0.0003298936,0.0002050962,0.0002316624,0.0002153217,0.0004597209,0.0001196505,0.00005950195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006523734,0.0001512896,0.0002301766,0.00005778359,0.00003846398,0.0004509758,0.00000874192,0.0003254898,0.000001172662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000769137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001016998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006235797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01746543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991037,0.000005553973,0.0003688543,0.00009443332,0.0001061882,0.0003212445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988914,0.00007775291,0.0001178895,0.0002909064,0.0002498232,0.0003722945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002477965,5.688984e-7,0.0001312682,0.0001992333,0.0001243611,0.00001369423,0.0001294036,0.9966151,0.0003297917,0.0005125181,0.00090366,0.001037996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002332877,0.00001466699,0.0005814406,0.0003301722,0.0001513014,0.00006285466,0.00005621482,0.9790016,0.0004647663,0.0009570564,0.01792844,0.0002182125],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1856827,0.03053324,0.7576864,0.003012404,0.0107402,0.0007381974,0.0003578466,0.0002800667,0.01096892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977726,0.00007119252,0.001191634,0.00001369471,0.0008130134,0.000002733455,0.000002415689,0.00003283919,0.00009986092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01704794755328061,"score_gpt":0.2171480491195941,"score_spread":0.2001001015663135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}