{"id":"W2596106594","doi":"10.1190/geo2016-0210.1","title":"Potential field continuation between arbitrary surfaces — Comparing methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Surface (topology); Field (mathematics); Continuation; Plane (geometry); Component (thermodynamics); Interpretation (philosophy); Data processing; Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Algorithm; Point (geometry); Domain (mathematical analysis); Potential field; Horizontal plane; Geometry; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geology; Geophysics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006978684,0.0009324871,0.001004684,0.002755891,0.0006936091,0.001824454,0.001743478,0.00173985,0.00434304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02976493,0.0004218986,0.001061569,0.001415305,0.001160168,0.002906772,0.003105853,0.001835065,0.001192541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009420894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001098087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001656645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008623247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966494,0.001693174,0.0002089585,0.0003196189,0.0009952663,0.0001335315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983048,0.01206573,0.0004543792,0.002076736,0.002065512,0.0002896503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001045667,0.0002890694,0.003431474,0.0007073052,0.0001990679,0.0002182899,0.0008000362,0.2684076,0.005589509,0.1177244,0.003234685,0.598353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000778641,0.0003087307,0.001868573,0.0001634895,0.00004415778,0.000211374,0.0002674345,0.9231103,0.004653148,0.05809864,0.01112528,0.00007105378],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02220766,0.0008867453,0.9685597,0.0001681972,0.0001339868,0.0001529519,0.00007536699,0.0007148289,0.007100569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2086264,0.0009665105,0.7854919,0.00009036904,0.0001029479,0.0003490695,0.0002690511,0.000596178,0.003507453],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006978684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03690726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03201645613752346,"score_gpt":0.3369875895192955,"score_spread":0.304971133381772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}