{"id":"W2597028695","doi":"10.1016/s0735-1097(17)33404-6","title":"AN UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF STEM CELL THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY ANGINA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical therapy; Angina; Coronary artery disease; Refractory (planetary science); Revascularization; Stem-cell therapy; Randomized controlled trial; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Stem cell; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Cardiology; Surgery; Oncology; Myocardial infarction; Transplantation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0195606,0.003568469,0.01545265,0.004462618,0.0006606206,0.003308415,0.001992079,0.002263694,0.005840183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05213668,0.00181443,0.04163003,0.004523413,0.0006155684,0.002232144,0.001855031,0.003150597,0.0006696889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005718975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01122474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783502,0.01163455,0.005441037,0.002381932,0.001670103,0.0005222055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720653,0.01955313,0.004153308,0.001914641,0.001897283,0.0004162297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007302479,0.00001804299,0.002914721,0.02993796,0.9530708,0.00007513942,0.0000328879,0.0004900986,0.0002440824,0.000109129,0.0009600433,0.004844602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00243104,0.0001372508,0.002709227,0.001230625,0.9920249,0.00004956022,0.00001331772,0.0001338033,0.00006008573,0.0001984071,0.0009945682,0.00001719913],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03741764,0.9443283,0.006188601,0.001188999,0.001772926,0.0006761161,0.006486646,0.0003002631,0.001640563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7608733,0.2105736,0.01056428,0.004719364,0.001781037,0.001498014,0.007643263,0.0003471573,0.001999937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0195606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1034475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1523663352394872,"score_gpt":0.4168783141252632,"score_spread":0.2645119788857759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}