{"id":"W2597364892","doi":"10.1111/risa.12769","title":"Fish for Dinner? Balancing Risks, Benefits, and Values in Formulating Food Consumption Advice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; BC Centre for Disease Control","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Unintended consequences; Business; Environmental health; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Risk analysis (engineering); Public economics; Marketing; Fishery; Medicine; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03117104,0.0006678059,0.0006636101,0.002189863,0.004817002,0.008392004,0.002120275,0.006764604,0.007426674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04203124,0.0005754514,0.0005295219,0.001144078,0.008795498,0.009670545,0.006606862,0.007632803,0.00191969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005893929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007821142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01094521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02816615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801391,0.01321097,0.0009891164,0.0005203821,0.004114838,0.001025658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783509,0.01548785,0.001222901,0.0005062735,0.002908733,0.001523324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003023474,0.0007103148,0.01691103,0.002084445,0.0001634682,0.001521529,0.15488,0.001851556,0.003509959,0.1125674,0.1273301,0.5781677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009621514,0.0003920622,0.01134393,0.008607931,0.000194448,0.001111063,0.1398921,0.003620901,0.002170463,0.2027343,0.6296005,0.0002362379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09685817,0.009975391,0.07396237,0.6465459,0.002812143,0.000589347,0.0002173809,0.0006429792,0.1683963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5967684,0.01846557,0.2759109,0.08217818,0.001543072,0.00072792,0.0002464332,0.0004033885,0.02375612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03117104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1648502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01992525605853156,"score_gpt":0.2746758490354155,"score_spread":0.254750592976884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}