{"id":"W2597671046","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.12253abstract","title":"Relational Conflict Resolution as an Ambicultural Approach to Conflict Management under Ambiguity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Dialectic; Mediation; Conflict resolution; Conflict management; Role conflict; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Social psychology; Resolution (logic); Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01330104,0.0008849271,0.0005830434,0.003940594,0.005953657,0.011315,0.002493794,0.001938842,0.003560864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01285543,0.0004346116,0.0008911607,0.003087647,0.02878369,0.01126163,0.008968838,0.00407881,0.0002892072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005090522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004599298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001756819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9783045,0.01714137,0.0008332269,0.001152928,0.001982506,0.0005854036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901361,0.005692521,0.002055796,0.0008754088,0.0007174447,0.0005228137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001265466,0.00005007719,0.002291237,0.0002855031,0.00003093893,0.0004301402,0.08679069,0.0009469214,0.0005746689,0.8898292,0.000590735,0.01816713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002583755,0.00007990221,0.002810132,0.0006844989,0.00004602203,0.001454109,0.1066353,0.005554039,0.0009622475,0.8145035,0.0671731,0.00007134015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1219428,0.009114575,0.5894308,0.02480779,0.00066282,0.0008656339,0.00009842849,0.0001436791,0.2529334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940099,0.002456043,0.0974144,0.001652836,0.0001496959,0.0006158907,0.00004951412,0.00003641602,0.003615238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01330104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07034349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.14653783281263,"score_gpt":0.3472458347477776,"score_spread":0.2007080019351476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}