{"id":"W2598231255","doi":"","title":"The rhetoric of corporate communication : A case study of an employee communication program /","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Corporate communication; Organizational communication; Public relations; Business; Political science; Stakeholder; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006478668,0.0005384547,0.0004393738,0.002194574,0.02346844,0.007318703,0.001588884,0.004847624,0.003488543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01518408,0.0004569969,0.0003492431,0.002136171,0.009268858,0.00515883,0.00473481,0.005066006,0.0005315294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004190932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003380422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01108438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02932719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895258,0.008636292,0.0001173667,0.0002687945,0.0007639103,0.0006878607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802986,0.01644443,0.001157004,0.0004868913,0.0007030839,0.0009099996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006326444,0.0002473952,0.003644072,0.0001178705,0.000008473361,0.007388036,0.9486075,0.0001250307,0.0009176754,0.02272394,0.003484951,0.01267186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002782413,0.0001332723,0.00315846,0.0002256373,0.00001942667,0.003646282,0.9389454,0.0006722685,0.0009677003,0.002291408,0.04988656,0.00002573689],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153141,0.0009591882,0.002716639,0.00941756,0.0001499414,0.00009255789,0.00003868623,0.00003498944,0.07127623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877314,0.000773348,0.001985986,0.001151028,0.00008958111,0.00007975111,0.00002291817,0.00004075021,0.008125274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02346844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0342629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0324549950230999,"score_gpt":0.26947539081596,"score_spread":0.2370203957928601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}