{"id":"W2598249285","doi":"10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102","title":"Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconventional oil; Hydraulic fracturing; Scholarship; Geopolitics; Natural resource economics; Energy policy; Politics; Futures contract; Energy development; Political science; Fossil fuel; Renewable energy; Political economy; Earth science; Economics; Ecology; Geology; Petroleum engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003077616,0.0003054398,0.0004007154,0.001458699,0.002773353,0.004664339,0.0007578098,0.003508874,0.003568215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00372889,0.0001455024,0.0002027773,0.002994186,0.01427706,0.006370092,0.003354784,0.002418459,0.0003212129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003429813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003739753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004799422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01512107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979866,0.001051587,0.00005843892,0.0001720839,0.0004414237,0.0002899334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960687,0.002961282,0.0003732659,0.0001064606,0.0003371553,0.0001531091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002306249,0.00003136408,0.002356042,0.001162713,0.00003496134,0.000793301,0.01090223,0.0009257873,0.0009709915,0.8117122,0.02486614,0.1462212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004018863,0.0000262625,0.003343489,0.00305209,0.00001295913,0.0004510733,0.04102358,0.0002791977,0.0006546259,0.2921601,0.6589642,0.00002824536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06930001,0.5303016,0.005767653,0.2285386,0.002202014,0.00002642071,0.00009287486,0.00001851366,0.1637523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136466,0.4523056,0.001521115,0.01926217,0.002009154,0.00003818837,0.00007876044,0.00002617926,0.01111237],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004799422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02488518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00968388624668237,"score_gpt":0.2489149082043395,"score_spread":0.2392310219576571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}