{"id":"W2598655868","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2017.8263837","title":"Optimal control of quantum purity for n = 2 systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Quantum chaos and dynamical systems","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dissipative system; Unitary state; Optimal control; Mathematics; Quantum; Decoupling (probability); Hamiltonian (control theory); Lindblad equation; Control theory (sociology); Ball (mathematics); Classical mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Control (management); Computer science; Quantum mechanics; Mathematical optimization; Master equation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009572374,0.0004257372,0.0006021679,0.0003394836,0.0004482626,0.001000803,0.0004729011,0.0007560404,0.001064998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00222022,0.000307412,0.0003080301,0.000201268,0.001932444,0.001034701,0.001167741,0.0006998619,0.00007810113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007745871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001976677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001078498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997162,0.0001171447,0.000008740288,0.00004748046,0.00006110803,0.00004929433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993112,0.0004192349,0.0001105872,0.00003399829,0.00006622703,0.00005881154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001843633,0.00005968191,0.000457806,0.00006860468,0.0000262835,0.00005627939,0.0001614999,0.8408605,0.008059767,0.1432378,0.0003190475,0.006508315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001410213,0.00002642523,0.00006533651,0.000003496349,0.000002158721,0.000003916998,0.00001313814,0.9750825,0.0005110847,0.0241427,0.0001294902,0.000005662867],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5043972,0.0005130562,0.4794697,0.0009577673,0.00006661572,0.00006011036,0.00004803104,0.0001322814,0.01435536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865557,0.00008013689,0.0117581,0.00004527769,0.00001210708,0.00003477068,0.0000137399,0.00002025403,0.001479904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001976677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00903213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02037270387355693,"score_gpt":0.2801367712183986,"score_spread":0.2597640673448417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}