{"id":"W2598871310","doi":"10.1007/s00027-017-0526-3","title":"Nearshore fish community responses to large scale dam removal: implications for watershed restoration and fish management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Washington State University","keywords":"Fishery; Dam removal; Oncorhynchus; Chinook wind; Estuary; Fish migration; Environmental science; Habitat; Ecology; Sediment; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001609595,0.0000862079,0.0001020549,0.00004439106,0.004322692,0.0001806485,0.0006001848,0.00002708855,0.00004878321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003170476,0.00007397735,0.00001993302,0.0001075402,0.0006427578,0.0003859902,0.0007343087,0.00004910788,0.0000392239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003828188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004375486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002195288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01401809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991175,0.00009134334,0.0001361608,0.000265262,0.0001331396,0.0002566268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.0001673591,0.00008539429,0.000469342,0.000007038513,0.00005512072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004419232,0.0001353681,0.7972444,0.00002646594,0.00002363566,0.000001503726,0.002938154,0.00004938099,0.0001135336,0.002436483,0.1924675,0.004519417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002055282,0.0001355657,0.9696102,0.000009418703,0.00002181527,0.000001068175,0.001503639,0.0006271879,0.00002969182,0.006753228,0.02099984,0.0001027786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9371173,0.000002343456,0.001017946,0.03519153,0.0001022042,0.0006959882,0.00001693915,0.00003180167,0.02582395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854601,0.00002625455,0.007827248,0.003628622,0.0000129506,0.0001686673,0.000007033336,0.000004306877,0.00286479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1723658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05443726584651756,"score_gpt":0.3209294541765906,"score_spread":0.266492188330073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}