{"id":"W2599160982","doi":"10.3997/1873-0604.2016052","title":"Comparison between 2D and 3D ERT inversion for engineering site investigations – a case study from Oslo Harbour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Near Surface Geophysics","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Harbour; Inversion (geology); Geology; Excavation; Engineering geology; Regional geology; Economic geology; Environmental geology; Electrical resistivity tomography; Telmatology; Seismology; Hydrogeology; Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Volcanism; Tectonics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008340076,0.0001896502,0.0002794583,0.00001579322,0.0001556886,0.00006099485,0.0000868243,0.00006486256,0.000004749838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003394922,0.000165176,0.00005025389,0.0001659373,0.00004002994,0.0001477617,0.00005692712,0.0001239588,0.00005246829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003072096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001241025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004653342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002646467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991642,0.00002515104,0.0002089268,0.0002570997,0.0001115042,0.0002331102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989517,0.0005164384,0.00003915254,0.0002893425,0.0000487184,0.0001546304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002453427,0.0006834502,0.2936439,0.00035052,0.000784329,0.00005813223,0.01045012,0.04818775,0.5210757,0.001789276,0.001638102,0.1213142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00367863,0.0004581266,0.1894514,0.0002138031,0.0006359127,0.00000680869,0.001331699,0.7627648,0.0146785,0.00579226,0.01927554,0.001712514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957849,0.00004313297,0.04099745,0.0001047469,0.00008607341,0.0004795943,0.000208905,0.0002179082,0.00001314992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469718,0.000003881367,0.05274496,0.00001129226,0.000144955,0.00004523209,0.0000177669,0.00004246621,0.0000176915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7145771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03196582171324556,"score_gpt":0.2796402005421966,"score_spread":0.247674378828951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}