{"id":"W2599478903","doi":"10.1177/1757975917690496","title":"Everyday ethics of participation: a case study of a CBPR in Nunavik","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Health Promotion","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Makivik Corporation; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université de Montréal; Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Reflexivity; Context (archaeology); Photovoice; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Political science; Economic growth; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01614119,0.0009390554,0.0008741111,0.001523842,0.04486464,0.006522088,0.005845642,0.004738136,0.002840149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01710239,0.0007854383,0.0006245533,0.001570181,0.02177451,0.002803947,0.009752895,0.005416121,0.0004143902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02941026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02944578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5289413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7156316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9741275,0.01937602,0.0004481494,0.001513631,0.001409645,0.003125177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805617,0.01219899,0.0009228137,0.0009178341,0.001863713,0.003534886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003081684,0.0001261132,0.003005041,0.000102369,0.000005806908,0.005806335,0.9846157,0.00009932507,0.0005272127,0.001741736,0.0003351454,0.003604395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005610173,0.00004621728,0.001880918,0.0001338972,0.000006000245,0.0006317868,0.9899544,0.0001578603,0.0001490335,0.0004278144,0.006588796,0.00001777599],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711533,0.001140295,0.003492586,0.007375714,0.0001344544,0.000828156,0.00005625488,0.00002909142,0.01579021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894917,0.0005514594,0.00219329,0.001006109,0.00001686147,0.0003240033,0.00002401252,0.00002994962,0.006362544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4710587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.805785044289463,"score_gpt":0.7587333886508806,"score_spread":0.04705165563858238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}