{"id":"W2599484388","doi":"10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.735","title":"Efficacy and safety of regorafenib compared to TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Regorafenib; Medicine; Colorectal cancer; Placebo; Internal medicine; Meta-analysis; Oncology; Randomized controlled trial; Randomization; Cancer; Pathology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01590025,0.0028318,0.01532568,0.01062022,0.0005699456,0.002553817,0.001937271,0.001952686,0.004030035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02790796,0.001349556,0.04683623,0.008509267,0.0006486434,0.001673971,0.001637497,0.00172708,0.0004034208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003164191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004536631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00827506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02081979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889944,0.005668662,0.002726034,0.001051979,0.001265206,0.0002937831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880279,0.008421483,0.00208598,0.0003676669,0.0009150735,0.0001818553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001774421,0.00002342471,0.003515199,0.3080368,0.6750338,0.0001020394,0.00006209841,0.0006222193,0.0001964461,0.0001550549,0.0005785364,0.009900027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005958898,0.0001271364,0.002408619,0.01527082,0.9797066,0.00006703426,0.00002541627,0.0002257557,0.0000749717,0.0001879794,0.001292132,0.00001752864],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005579139,0.9903201,0.001062113,0.0004139083,0.0002030366,0.0006493764,0.00133504,0.00003906035,0.0003980886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2419466,0.7456847,0.005148107,0.001264422,0.0003576469,0.00285119,0.002143985,0.00004787583,0.0005554428],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01590025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08408958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4970990250534385,"score_gpt":0.583730368497327,"score_spread":0.08663134344388845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}