{"id":"W2599521091","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2017.02.028","title":"Conservative vs optimistic rationality in games: A revisitation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Status quo; Mathematical economics; Irrational number; Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Class (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009492454,0.001129916,0.001909404,0.002396984,0.001289089,0.006586523,0.003889947,0.004646806,0.00514325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0177232,0.0006215809,0.001627085,0.003538994,0.01405204,0.01123831,0.002889646,0.01057279,0.001148125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003111925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003346918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004766275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004398964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958151,0.00135419,0.000446109,0.0008437849,0.00116811,0.0003727128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736032,0.02143821,0.000993752,0.001100899,0.002485635,0.000378334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002826469,0.00004235481,0.0004840654,0.0002628607,0.00004700642,0.0001040561,0.0009145097,0.00100839,0.0001487743,0.9701811,0.008200173,0.01857845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750698,0.00001930449,0.0007987491,0.0001993819,0.00003370733,0.00007652883,0.0003303182,0.001634594,0.0000867421,0.9815886,0.01519013,0.00002448846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06193638,0.1139649,0.2104757,0.3621031,0.01327236,0.0001425487,0.0007605598,0.0001901786,0.2371544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126428,0.05530984,0.03585467,0.05120779,0.02639809,0.0002787428,0.0002079169,0.0002882967,0.01781183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009492454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05020154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1629150703059851,"score_gpt":0.4034625065800938,"score_spread":0.2405474362741087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}