{"id":"W2599540835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869326","title":"Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: The Relevance of Ancillary Harm","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Harm; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Law; Psychology; Computer science; Sentence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003629295,0.0001007367,0.0001305892,0.00003450392,0.0008678371,0.00004790094,0.0004551401,0.00005689254,0.0001937567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782607,0.00006532962,0.0001341095,0.0001775442,0.0003026999,0.0003645299,0.0000492894,0.001283186,0.0000323069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008459729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002468249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002767061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04387188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973606,0.0001276319,0.0002520648,0.0001275955,0.0005668931,0.001565231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991486,0.0001547651,0.0002370098,0.0001729642,0.0001747592,0.0001119217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001085904,0.0004841362,0.1550287,0.00005795198,0.0009010771,0.00005066467,0.05866243,0.0002125869,0.1400536,0.4925558,0.01208667,0.1388205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001892935,0.001637091,0.02304427,0.0001742721,0.0003090662,0.001121193,0.1219416,0.0001794983,0.005270534,0.4193974,0.4240037,0.00102848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917654,0.001237942,0.0002194722,0.003934075,0.0004350518,0.0001114942,0.000002617156,0.00001474908,0.002279156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921579,0.005674098,0.00003102561,0.00008300192,0.000345443,0.000001705663,5.871904e-7,0.000009347344,0.001696945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4119171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02195998417244064,"score_gpt":0.3669219951907091,"score_spread":0.3449620110182684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}