{"id":"W2600096071","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.44.5.571","title":"Adult Sibling and Sibling-In-Law Relationships in South Korea: Continuity and Change of Confucian Family Norms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sibling; Normative; Brother; Sister; Sibling relationship; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Sociology; Thematic analysis; Gender studies; Marriage law; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Law; Geography; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00106594,0.0001408499,0.0005631656,0.0003343467,0.0002723578,0.00007157754,0.0001115242,0.00007101557,0.000001511993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002462057,0.0001158515,0.00005801004,0.0003450555,0.000580873,0.0005471998,0.00006029868,0.0003123404,0.000001138121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009076998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006962017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001649241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02081281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983639,0.0002844646,0.0006535909,0.0001448187,0.0003426838,0.0002106136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977642,0.0005167063,0.0004588476,0.00005581968,0.001131465,0.00007292102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004652188,0.00006837498,0.5798244,0.00003617732,0.0001207244,0.000007140221,0.3203602,0.0001249553,0.0008458653,0.09817333,0.0001891473,0.0002031259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006239164,0.0001168972,0.7227701,0.0003361627,0.00001741425,8.769349e-7,0.2696846,0.0006961618,0.00001463408,0.00546127,0.0001479537,0.0001299725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882968,0.00588709,0.00005307459,0.0004275064,0.0002354097,0.0002554405,0.000008346253,0.000003906043,0.004832432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975364,0.001605418,0.0003630118,0.0002699569,0.000149458,0.00001408452,8.74641e-7,0.000005475383,0.0000552811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1429457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1322079288748261,"score_gpt":0.3583098099892116,"score_spread":0.2261018811143856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}