{"id":"W2600348831","doi":"10.18260/1-2--16905","title":"Design Of An Instrument To Assess Understanding Of Engineering Design","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capstone; Engineering education; Curriculum; Discipline; Multidisciplinary approach; Engineering design process; Rubric; Engineering; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Mathematics education; Mechanical engineering; Pedagogy; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03821818,0.00201862,0.001893113,0.003869374,0.001433877,0.0025806,0.001895989,0.001820434,0.009250415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06335808,0.001336278,0.001955539,0.00231257,0.001670488,0.002377244,0.002757962,0.002383998,0.003868099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005334052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000741679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007903362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.974481,0.01396515,0.003707453,0.00234359,0.00432408,0.001178718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9195927,0.04587898,0.004028015,0.003311452,0.02549279,0.001696042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01256616,0.01205014,0.1291849,0.004888348,0.0005563853,0.0003784471,0.01399619,0.005905578,0.02340517,0.01350928,0.02234439,0.761215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02190732,0.08381398,0.4257177,0.00351444,0.001550454,0.0007711481,0.04221248,0.1057474,0.05429253,0.03235111,0.2265503,0.001571107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3408756,0.0004222887,0.2359863,0.0009708151,0.001276006,0.3929024,0.00438794,0.002069382,0.02110926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1031841,0.0002429639,0.2770955,0.0005208233,0.00009730134,0.6129315,0.002265565,0.0002010766,0.003461204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03821818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2021195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1197905190041412,"score_gpt":0.2503792750429528,"score_spread":0.1305887560388116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}