{"id":"W2600352605","doi":"10.1002/eqe.2894","title":"Aftershock collapse fragility curves for non‐ductile RC buildings: a scenario‐based assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II","keywords":"Fragility; Aftershock; Brittleness; Structural engineering; Reinforced concrete; Ground motion; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Shear wall; Intensity (physics); Shear (geology); Geology; Engineering; Seismology; Materials science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006296809,0.0006934938,0.0002954125,0.002032266,0.0001519129,0.0003880752,0.000478975,0.000606477,0.0009511486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001176255,0.0001790208,0.0006202899,0.0009212866,0.0002398108,0.0004453645,0.0004927076,0.0003105909,0.0001162538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005613931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001691554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005798682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004311217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999765,0.00007240335,0.00001231346,0.00003339697,0.00007985405,0.00003709725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991302,0.0004147057,0.0001482245,0.00009696486,0.0001484381,0.00006162122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002019001,0.00006649152,0.0273684,0.00005999119,0.00008195539,0.0002998541,0.00007062248,0.9558851,0.00533387,0.0007913413,0.00024348,0.009597035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008137664,0.0002757447,0.05505189,0.00001410757,0.00003280689,0.0001584296,0.00008785912,0.9401473,0.003380486,0.0004430602,0.0003752428,0.00002501006],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908198,0.0000706746,0.007269389,0.00002370868,0.000002037768,0.00002943622,0.0005745687,0.00007914727,0.001131297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982139,0.00003910642,0.001283889,0.000001535803,0.000001420382,0.0000102478,0.0003502266,0.000005533125,0.00009430406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005798682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0115298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006703903106467161,"score_gpt":0.2397050159871951,"score_spread":0.2330011128807279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}