{"id":"W2600352605","doi":"10.1002/eqe.2894","title":"Aftershock collapse fragility curves for non‐ductile RC buildings: a scenario‐based assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II","keywords":"Fragility; Aftershock; Brittleness; Structural engineering; Reinforced concrete; Ground motion; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Shear wall; Intensity (physics); Shear (geology); Geology; Engineering; Seismology; Materials science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001885471,0.0003971987,0.0004563112,0.0001393855,0.0003565772,0.0002341793,0.0005140474,0.0001319896,0.00004368911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008346061,0.0004006717,0.0002541454,0.0001422037,0.00005742182,0.0004545916,0.00005978253,0.0003266367,0.00000612222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002342617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004927377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005105342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007306704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984289,0.000006900831,0.000369631,0.000357798,0.0002672401,0.0005695481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.00005770952,0.0001016446,0.0008051713,0.00009327965,0.0001496829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004040567,0.00002724637,0.01899743,0.002555606,0.0004937984,0.00002109362,0.0001954337,0.834268,0.00147085,0.0003170319,0.00143819,0.1401749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004058848,0.0000297223,0.2989173,0.0001720491,0.00005612949,0.000004101183,0.00001629652,0.6986695,0.0001505156,0.00002318273,0.001199599,0.000355727],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398804,0.0001532571,0.05758143,0.0002307813,0.001090145,0.0003779214,0.000181834,0.0003712005,0.0001329963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98835,0.00007052308,0.0108151,0.00008662569,0.000238969,0.0000784306,0.0001612988,0.00007218991,0.0001268802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2799199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006703903106467161,"score_gpt":0.2397050159871951,"score_spread":0.2330011128807279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}