{"id":"W2600564521","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103414","title":"Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tides Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Deception; Reimbursement; Clinical trial; Undue influence; Informed consent; Health care; Medicine; Unintended consequences; Internet privacy; Business; Family medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08814611,0.000135466,0.0006178668,0.0002329687,0.000303755,0.00009457221,0.001010826,0.002447826,0.000483205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4513575,0.00009686278,0.0001592979,0.0001284903,0.0008638406,0.0001383792,0.0005096949,0.0373527,0.00002302994],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01185756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002426802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985796,0.0007485791,0.001389411,0.0002322567,0.0114687,0.000365078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704406,0.02405253,0.000794336,0.001046332,0.002368185,0.00129796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000714182,0.006013872,0.3566047,0.0009332868,0.0004015365,0.5894932,0.0213795,0.000003175613,0.0000690214,0.007353903,0.001376342,0.01565733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09457203,0.03026185,0.4151666,0.02883368,0.001159735,0.1607942,0.1419808,0.001139377,0.0005605038,0.1109303,0.01321057,0.001390426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666084,0.0001871496,0.0001106607,0.1302326,0.0007099796,0.0002419176,7.667496e-7,0.000005330905,0.001903147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932411,0.002258833,0.000376044,0.002906355,0.0008745839,0.000003395262,2.227006e-7,0.00001715031,0.0003223695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.428699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8079533733801705,"score_gpt":0.7131824891465726,"score_spread":0.09477088423359792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}