{"id":"W2600564521","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103414","title":"Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tides Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Deception; Reimbursement; Clinical trial; Undue influence; Informed consent; Health care; Medicine; Unintended consequences; Internet privacy; Business; Family medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01441695,0.001236529,0.0009465845,0.001684777,0.01425245,0.004372642,0.002750401,0.009661548,0.005171432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04890721,0.000840953,0.001418295,0.001360241,0.00551634,0.002878165,0.00438288,0.008364463,0.0008297476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004418487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006453772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008505723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821529,0.01188128,0.0008004764,0.001184641,0.00214495,0.001835788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661797,0.02120934,0.003682354,0.002161215,0.001916569,0.004850867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005885542,0.00199779,0.0393629,0.0007391447,0.0001007759,0.7615115,0.1003166,0.0004921676,0.0009871781,0.03791519,0.01584087,0.04014732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001415938,0.001556563,0.01471228,0.001809454,0.0001333722,0.7612477,0.1129989,0.002287876,0.002405898,0.01802521,0.08444834,0.0002327776],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.85855,0.004281112,0.01166936,0.05534169,0.001064041,0.001821313,0.0002553797,0.0001643978,0.0668527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656103,0.00260881,0.008886071,0.01122689,0.0005226609,0.0009397929,0.00008534003,0.00009955875,0.0100205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07624501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8079533733801705,"score_gpt":0.7131824891465726,"score_spread":0.09477088423359792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}