{"id":"W2601314166","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2754940","title":"A Second-Order Cone Programming Model for Planning PEV Fast-Charging Stations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure","field":"Engineering","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Second-order cone programming; Computer science; Order (exchange); Electric power system; Mathematical optimization; Power (physics); Mathematics; Physics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001110683,0.0002083568,0.0002307349,0.0001296651,0.0006914897,0.0002940072,0.0002002653,0.0001256886,0.00003108579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003924907,0.0002110446,0.00009573305,0.00007865866,0.00002694926,0.0003308194,7.597296e-7,0.0002736897,0.0000104017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008188702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003607918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001756956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002573312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989591,0.00001029423,0.0002811699,0.0002194201,0.0001473558,0.0003826207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992967,0.000045086,0.00008209799,0.0003827792,0.00009692031,0.00009645454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454755,0.0000215529,0.00001243785,0.0001535019,0.0001242639,0.000002506237,0.00169137,0.9913701,0.00232349,0.0002306841,0.0006964969,0.003359064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005757306,0.00006584772,0.00003418285,0.0001115618,0.00003303535,0.00001813882,0.0003234876,0.9924239,0.001611075,0.00004809462,0.004492385,0.0002625684],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0156933,0.0001691575,0.980541,0.00003454322,0.00131571,0.0006072841,0.0001565144,0.0003072573,0.001175266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940914,0.000006142895,0.004032986,0.0000208938,0.00003218668,0.0002874947,0.000005877455,0.0000674199,0.001455592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01738245918397806,"score_gpt":0.251398292818309,"score_spread":0.2340158336343309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}