{"id":"W2601335947","doi":"","title":"Considering agro-ecosystems as ecological funds for collective design: New perspectives for environmental policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Collective action; General partnership; Ecosystem services; Business; Process (computing); Democratization; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Political science; Ecology; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148664,0.0004453069,0.0006922518,0.0001492338,0.0006097775,0.0002504432,0.0007867719,0.0007321006,0.0004520082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008971095,0.0001836212,0.0003770608,0.0001761491,0.0002872778,0.0001212101,0.0009118463,0.0007090941,0.00003095022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002782274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000973658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001407729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006124875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961157,0.0003328994,0.0005842668,0.001319075,0.0003255366,0.001322449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954776,0.003612885,0.0001995134,0.0001758935,0.0001226503,0.000411476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002156567,0.0009523234,0.003867688,0.0002134765,0.0007163073,0.00003837301,0.001655286,0.0004792003,0.06639322,0.004515669,0.01612288,0.902889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007160895,0.008826915,0.12353,0.001130082,0.00007728219,0.0001512911,0.04023528,0.002763763,0.01553118,0.1642516,0.631253,0.005088645],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828678,0.001225871,0.00014753,0.02985188,0.0008274029,0.01935985,0.00151275,0.0002165399,0.06399037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924609,0.006883698,0.001602387,0.0001136152,0.002760244,0.003136561,0.0003146082,0.00001615264,0.06056372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8978004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7487857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05596595087339018,"score_gpt":0.3061455473611563,"score_spread":0.2501795964877661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}