{"id":"W2601335947","doi":"","title":"Considering agro-ecosystems as ecological funds for collective design: New perspectives for environmental policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Collective action; General partnership; Ecosystem services; Business; Process (computing); Democratization; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Political science; Ecology; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01379411,0.0009357723,0.001075995,0.002057984,0.004878873,0.01429089,0.002247991,0.008127622,0.009834948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01448663,0.0004393054,0.001266656,0.002052947,0.02889631,0.02204082,0.00637287,0.004553208,0.0006450502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0123878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007435626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003861351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003374259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907195,0.006455396,0.0002133978,0.0007353156,0.0009859256,0.0008904458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869915,0.008751688,0.000835534,0.001617444,0.0009567831,0.0008471989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003964344,0.00001012079,0.00009087416,0.0000181334,0.000002763589,0.00001561897,0.0003757262,0.001242458,0.00002002588,0.9957464,0.0004162501,0.002057588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000758761,0.000007756086,0.00007958685,0.00005083755,0.000003511014,0.00001566719,0.0005570311,0.00148585,0.00005361825,0.9787784,0.01895457,0.000005655705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04985272,0.009377665,0.3465215,0.2405696,0.0008250291,0.0001521008,0.0001264769,0.0001600262,0.3524149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282684,0.003745584,0.04564139,0.003497508,0.0005603133,0.000438504,0.00005584382,0.000118417,0.01767405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01429089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08988017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05596595087339018,"score_gpt":0.3061455473611563,"score_spread":0.2501795964877661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}