{"id":"W2601450563","doi":"10.1165/rcmb.2016-0395oc","title":"Gene Expression Analysis to Assess the Relevance of Rodent Models to Human Lung Injury","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology","topic":"Respiratory Support and Mechanisms","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Rodent; Relevance (law); Human lung; Computational biology; Expression (computer science); Rodent model; Gene; Gene expression; Biology; Medicine; Lung; Genetics; Internal medicine; Computer science; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002066223,0.0003261776,0.0004978196,0.001264563,0.0002452839,0.0006758306,0.0002044983,0.0002732161,0.001508292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001870234,0.0001436199,0.0005394249,0.001114362,0.0004572663,0.0002095995,0.0003770695,0.0005071783,0.0003114954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002621053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002857562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004332733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005883261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998256,0.0006055192,0.0001864696,0.0004772938,0.0003540274,0.0001206976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984474,0.0006224683,0.0004213477,0.0002809076,0.0001753379,0.00005263515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001777019,0.0004793007,0.1571746,0.0004973925,0.00084129,0.000140675,0.0001023433,0.002431779,0.8105016,0.0005096715,0.0007475706,0.02479673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007801741,0.003362591,0.7074497,0.0000667121,0.0006661,0.001403817,0.0002686896,0.008839781,0.2657241,0.0007393803,0.01135209,0.00004895772],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.959151,0.0025653,0.0275619,0.0001659888,0.00005807001,0.0002282607,0.0086485,0.0001865049,0.001434526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683846,0.0007337911,0.01828831,0.0001990015,0.00002270516,0.0007126089,0.01094424,0.00006758273,0.000647166],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002066223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01092738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07118691378795292,"score_gpt":0.3957194000987358,"score_spread":0.3245324863107829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}