{"id":"W2601526318","doi":"10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.10082","title":"Competing risk events determining probability of cause-specific failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cumulative incidence; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Incidence (geometry); Survival analysis; Cohort; Distant metastasis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Oncology; Metastasis; Cancer; Radiation therapy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01476347,0.0004839454,0.000770827,0.002718508,0.0003844771,0.001032073,0.001051419,0.0006220941,0.002020106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04507023,0.0002694519,0.001898632,0.001567242,0.000572805,0.001076491,0.001009555,0.0009992989,0.0001629021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008899003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009309044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002831171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001847618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944085,0.003080416,0.0006420735,0.0006849159,0.0008469181,0.0003372533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268992,0.05888094,0.008354045,0.002430574,0.002468867,0.0009662762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003201446,0.00003693354,0.9754071,0.0001749847,0.0003500954,0.0002126404,0.0002778874,0.00697554,0.0001318441,0.001250876,0.0003398537,0.01452216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006123311,0.0003605019,0.8714584,0.0001498396,0.0006197367,0.003033377,0.0005155823,0.1075294,0.001058864,0.01300371,0.002108784,0.0001005385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470354,0.003021182,0.04662076,0.000271735,0.00004546361,0.0002314911,0.001353086,0.00008143177,0.001339247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961327,0.0001920781,0.002982437,0.00002211441,0.00002001444,0.00007281594,0.0004552128,0.000008796865,0.0001137295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01476347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07807767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08881425952069948,"score_gpt":0.4466953554891056,"score_spread":0.3578810959684061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}