{"id":"W2603001075","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.005","title":"Riparian wetland conservation: A case study of phosphorous and social return on investment in the Black River watershed","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosystem Services","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Wetland; Watershed; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Eutrophication; Riparian buffer; Flood control; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Flood myth; Geography; Ecology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003239884,0.0001071631,0.0001529462,0.00001740349,0.000316481,0.00009368815,0.0002932989,0.00004356856,0.00000927897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001767849,0.00006811489,0.00001756316,0.00003986157,0.00007025641,0.0001669304,0.0001422687,0.00006248247,0.00002015025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004328438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000246515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01772208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04396924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991425,0.0001128623,0.0002012321,0.0002093043,0.0002023736,0.0001316968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00002735197,0.0001785415,0.0003141849,0.000006209171,0.00002573201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617968,0.0001987672,0.943858,0.00005839536,0.00001326674,0.0002584767,0.05539719,0.00002244052,0.000007690265,0.0000207687,0.00006121119,0.00006767345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002790381,0.0004296984,0.9439681,0.00005623923,0.00004425082,0.0001049693,0.04067947,0.009847297,0.00006909092,0.0007600619,0.001041893,0.0002085771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979458,0.00000529038,1.467731e-7,0.0006547296,0.00007305191,0.0004443478,0.00001025096,0.000007297779,0.0008590237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.000002664068,0.000007087519,0.0003664998,0.00002489011,0.00002080511,0.000004531439,0.000005639938,0.00001813103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02624716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01623049442357888,"score_gpt":0.2296804011250667,"score_spread":0.2134499067014878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}