{"id":"W2603001075","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.005","title":"Riparian wetland conservation: A case study of phosphorous and social return on investment in the Black River watershed","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosystem Services","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Wetland; Watershed; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Eutrophication; Riparian buffer; Flood control; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Flood myth; Geography; Ecology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008263147,0.0001657079,0.0001899241,0.0004954712,0.003064165,0.001050382,0.0007413611,0.0008919074,0.001363402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001509928,0.000116532,0.000177867,0.0008230151,0.001571313,0.0006250538,0.001084952,0.0005271829,0.00004893915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003833011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00291576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1389775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.485922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994867,0.0002311009,0.000007320985,0.00003081444,0.00004653535,0.0001975046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991691,0.0003035018,0.0001409092,0.00004170645,0.00007505543,0.0002698124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007798714,0.003355223,0.7218175,0.0001381241,0.0002025012,0.02782167,0.06547916,0.006284031,0.007720219,0.02142466,0.003661519,0.1413156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000560548,0.0007949564,0.8300418,0.00009267628,0.00009680396,0.002699821,0.1412028,0.009557079,0.001692927,0.002974759,0.01075323,0.0000371321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981035,0.00002818707,0.00007533425,0.0001725272,7.431697e-7,0.000009461894,0.000007211794,0.000001337728,0.001601601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988177,0.00005869618,0.0002108078,0.00002863544,0.000001254202,0.000006316026,0.000007406315,0.000001460826,0.0008675643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1389775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2763371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01623049442357888,"score_gpt":0.2296804011250667,"score_spread":0.2134499067014878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}