{"id":"W2603318167","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i1.4696","title":"Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Electrical conductor; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01128014,0.0007065574,0.0006239488,0.002935541,0.00296003,0.009465936,0.001616891,0.00524451,0.008103444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02341236,0.0004320716,0.0009414635,0.001645982,0.01660523,0.02171046,0.007369972,0.004485045,0.001325652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001891009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001631755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002666812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002163206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876521,0.008494461,0.000399896,0.0008185951,0.001998045,0.0006369628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841891,0.01147124,0.001066515,0.001512356,0.001276552,0.0004842469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006842773,0.000004933499,0.00005523557,0.00002104418,0.000002766991,0.00006204702,0.001193429,0.0001785791,0.0001399633,0.9966899,0.0001543025,0.001490872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001434392,0.00002771231,0.00006761675,0.00007470087,0.00001110193,0.0002150828,0.001102498,0.001977069,0.0006198702,0.9780872,0.01778948,0.00001333068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04568849,0.001169927,0.5838736,0.009836121,0.0004698636,0.0001850043,0.00005765029,0.0003341958,0.3583852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384238,0.0004560365,0.04683309,0.0008309973,0.0001474053,0.0001972399,0.00003149056,0.0001214075,0.01295856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01128014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05965579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09421506125148042,"score_gpt":0.3196989579595454,"score_spread":0.225483896708065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}