{"id":"W2603611363","doi":"10.15173/esr.v21i1.2529","title":"MODELING OF EMISSION TRADING: A LITERATURE REVIEW FOR DYNAMIC PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS WITH PERFECT COMPETITION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Energy Studies Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emissions trading; Partial equilibrium; Economics; Competition (biology); Marginal cost; Microeconomics; Econometrics; General equilibrium theory; Climate change; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009852129,0.001608167,0.002102019,0.001669805,0.0004045281,0.002141352,0.001989427,0.002036407,0.004434923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002670314,0.0006583522,0.001535188,0.003685094,0.0008574847,0.002833704,0.0008953192,0.001585004,0.001134169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001123922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001912975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00344719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.0001554706,0.00004999817,0.00009588509,0.0001278999,0.00003190081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984496,0.001160276,0.0001277408,0.00006521225,0.0001713521,0.00002586585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006098854,0.0001836942,0.002034099,0.0155354,0.0004096758,0.00047313,0.0002603045,0.1367717,0.0009932927,0.4275925,0.02535864,0.3903266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002997584,0.000106673,0.001701016,0.00742911,0.0004234202,0.0009095251,0.0002808164,0.1144259,0.0008057323,0.3817776,0.4919502,0.0001600842],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002645499,0.9131921,0.0646027,0.002743067,0.0004379243,0.00003032836,0.0002721697,0.00009853095,0.01597764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03973919,0.9412279,0.01458557,0.0004620041,0.0008258641,0.00006835232,0.0003274982,0.00004336207,0.002720249],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004434923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2725292558396062,"score_gpt":0.364660439460379,"score_spread":0.09213118362077283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}