{"id":"W2604483461","doi":"","title":"An adaptive choice of primal constrains for BDDC domain decomposition algorithms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis","topic":"Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Schur complement; Preconditioner; Domain decomposition methods; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Upper and lower bounds; Norm (philosophy); Condition number; Schur decomposition; Conjugate gradient method; Algorithm; Finite element method; Iterative method; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764668,0.0002332501,0.0004940125,0.0002991595,0.0001053523,0.00001097183,0.000190398,0.00009613137,0.0001645413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002780074,0.0001882618,0.0003926933,0.001087163,0.0001057892,0.0001814167,0.000001730281,0.0001733241,0.000005801257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003366014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004677149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005060321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008973207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984171,0.000101268,0.0004667827,0.0003257958,0.0002630013,0.0004260576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979669,0.001412752,0.0001063008,0.0002722492,0.0001107545,0.0001310149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001474399,0.0004794291,0.00001211985,0.00003240828,0.002574723,7.535684e-7,0.0001082106,0.7266846,0.01170238,0.007422219,0.000007535486,0.2508281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001147268,0.0015332,0.0002531658,0.00003540723,0.001401409,0.000006228836,0.00007825582,0.910412,0.02009941,0.06394966,0.0005380063,0.000546015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005329264,0.00005415858,0.9937127,0.0001549583,0.00005852102,0.0002441478,0.0001412519,0.0002128371,0.0000921367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6269354,0.00001990918,0.372864,0.00001889255,0.00003049522,0.0000812654,0.000009178727,0.00002752256,0.00001329443],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6216062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7677095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01748277575701655,"score_gpt":0.3256021547602164,"score_spread":0.3081193790031999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}