{"id":"W2604709398","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6493","title":"ENGINEERING PERSUASION: TEACHING RHETORICAL SAVVY FOR ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Persuasion; Key (lock); Sociology; Rhetorical device; Epistemology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Linguistics; Engineering; Social psychology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00220413,0.0003943878,0.0002530637,0.0007128093,0.001642748,0.002789315,0.0006672445,0.001305832,0.00414361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006766722,0.0001484966,0.0002938442,0.0002991243,0.002043676,0.00188565,0.002029903,0.002889794,0.001060967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009964306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002257221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002837391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008161775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.0007824482,0.0000302329,0.0001025541,0.0003214728,0.0001146204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958045,0.003191151,0.0001951595,0.0001245897,0.0002675534,0.0004170456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001506631,0.003759616,0.00487719,0.001340306,0.00003271609,0.001487209,0.09801056,0.002178662,0.02655918,0.2691303,0.0387519,0.5537217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096026,0.002580492,0.0093699,0.001755642,0.00009378284,0.003003363,0.04263807,0.01463675,0.03291776,0.2461696,0.6464044,0.000120619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4361579,0.002846214,0.1796972,0.02452989,0.002172153,0.0007964008,0.00003240761,0.001063847,0.352704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033753,0.0015871,0.06231339,0.002617767,0.0003465006,0.0003256286,0.00003653671,0.0001205456,0.02927721],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00414361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01386172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04597189800236379,"score_gpt":0.2957855639592666,"score_spread":0.2498136659569028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}