{"id":"W2604787968","doi":"10.1007/s10531-017-1348-2","title":"Trading populations—can biodiversity offsets effectively compensate for population losses?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of New England","keywords":"Biodiversity; Threatened species; Population; Biology; Biodiversity hotspot; Habitat; Ecology; Offset (computer science); Habitat destruction; Genetic diversity; Population size; Agroforestry; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002097223,0.0001157134,0.0001117006,0.00003726303,0.001872447,0.0001278286,0.0001638866,0.00006131779,0.0001683047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004676395,0.0001297504,0.00004904661,0.00004088457,0.0001782465,0.000571922,0.0002106871,0.00004646705,0.00008230501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001211585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002786345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007692072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002030262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992619,0.00003570022,0.0001168493,0.0002872843,0.0001567101,0.0001415689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994851,0.00003169434,0.0001954607,0.0002082188,0.00001019287,0.00006938171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005299185,0.00003402081,0.9855423,0.00001435082,0.00001131247,0.000001090464,0.00009606523,0.00001059084,0.000381931,0.0005271459,0.01097922,0.002348989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007601027,0.00004334129,0.9855165,0.000007269833,0.00004668632,9.151341e-7,0.00007505894,0.001545311,0.0001818421,0.0005338436,0.01113032,0.0001587825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889826,0.000004751618,0.0008269128,0.008958736,0.0001412469,0.0005150074,0.0001021382,0.00003917801,0.000429383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962879,0.00001258845,0.001325414,0.001956355,0.000009825849,0.000007388421,0.0002179103,0.000002300998,0.0001802533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007305318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05260130577037973,"score_gpt":0.2434128115261307,"score_spread":0.190811505755751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}