{"id":"W2604833271","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1938","title":"Using adaptive processes and adverse outcome pathways to develop meaningful, robust, and actionable environmental monitoring programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance; Alberta Energy","funders":"Canada's Oil Sands Innovation Alliance","keywords":"Adverse Outcome Pathway; Outcome (game theory); Environmental monitoring; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental science; Business; Environmental engineering; Computational biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004185225,0.0002837142,0.0002190977,0.0001167036,0.001830051,0.0004116812,0.000213315,0.00007626107,0.00009480413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001134106,0.0002703248,0.00002556876,0.00008698313,0.0004011595,0.000727017,0.0006177303,0.0001424564,0.00001421145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005718022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002758675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005877428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002208118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982314,0.00006791786,0.0002724639,0.0005668297,0.0004519902,0.0004094275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993216,0.00001590841,0.0001673463,0.0002225175,0.00001159477,0.0002610722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144048,0.0006543537,0.6754549,0.0001857268,0.0004152824,0.00009406359,0.01265101,0.0002484146,0.001728377,0.006904516,0.0002290204,0.30132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001471029,0.0002912773,0.752098,0.0002338393,0.0002527352,0.00000621495,0.162689,0.0008967179,0.0001236455,0.0003729101,0.08062954,0.0009350538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983034,0.0001174277,0.005021036,0.0004115588,0.0002792916,0.001525775,0.00001787456,0.00008622562,0.009506836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695843,0.003372792,0.02459815,0.00008733902,0.00006484654,0.0001480207,0.00001705392,0.00002418089,0.002103258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3003849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09690071540864283,"score_gpt":0.3361421984617247,"score_spread":0.2392414830530819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}