{"id":"W2604943677","doi":"10.1109/edaps.2016.7893162","title":"Efficient time-domain variability analysis of active circuits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Electronic circuit; Laplace transform; Time domain; Stability (learning theory); Domain analysis; Inversion (geology); Algorithm; Reduction (mathematics); Model order reduction; Electronic engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Software; Machine learning; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003974462,0.0004275424,0.0003827359,0.0004678986,0.0002136811,0.0005506882,0.0006470853,0.0003278827,0.00112414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001382631,0.0001702389,0.0004773854,0.0003228195,0.0003300574,0.0007257852,0.0004230667,0.0006819651,0.0002572685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004404855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007831589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009500975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997965,0.00003854463,0.000006372409,0.00002296653,0.0001214793,0.00001428867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995878,0.0002422443,0.00004238046,0.00004209776,0.00007491965,0.00001041855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004284347,0.00002945184,0.000506325,0.00009048528,0.00003422849,0.00008321922,0.00005974424,0.8079867,0.03663375,0.06052411,0.0007722905,0.09323688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001154628,0.000005597754,0.00005569227,0.000001747316,0.000001564046,0.0000136726,0.000002362525,0.9944274,0.001461492,0.003655782,0.0003711168,0.000002438752],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00466948,0.0000478638,0.9943721,0.00002688203,0.000005552194,0.000007736127,0.00001925682,0.0001167415,0.0007342906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7164256,0.0004265796,0.2797973,0.00005869323,0.00005633889,0.0001220081,0.0002345458,0.0001574475,0.002721488],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00112414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003760636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04101701049752651,"score_gpt":0.2992035217443095,"score_spread":0.2581865112467829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}