{"id":"W2605199239","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2017.1292151","title":"Institutional arrangements for assessing and managing cumulative effects on watersheds: Lessons from the Grand River watershed, Ontario, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Watershed; Corporate governance; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Cumulative effects; Watershed management; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Business; Public administration; Geography; Economics; Finance; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004527607,0.0003803126,0.00034442,0.00007673677,0.006006046,0.001113741,0.0008153886,0.0001105909,0.0002683599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007558403,0.0002535972,0.000113157,0.00003477793,0.0009668092,0.0006666598,0.0001663523,0.000438017,0.00001054993],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003956608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002104245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99766,0.0001667522,0.0003254781,0.0004858221,0.0002684701,0.001093517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981623,0.0001373692,0.0002248593,0.0004092653,0.00002308931,0.001043163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441054,0.00003540558,0.4322072,0.00006623045,0.0004567174,0.001146446,0.5269629,0.001824633,0.001068058,0.000006456567,0.0008190178,0.03526279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000915526,0.0001050437,0.4147471,0.0003370614,0.0001069601,0.00007835394,0.0008601938,0.0001524266,0.001202655,0.003048904,0.5779493,0.0004964077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991695,0.0000885625,0.00003095247,0.004941751,0.0003748688,0.0004142073,0.0001057402,0.00001023168,0.00233868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964592,0.00005801086,0.0002128137,0.001383071,0.0003404495,0.00003234611,0.00005639996,0.00004116855,0.001416496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5771304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02207366309034653,"score_gpt":0.2436516840945346,"score_spread":0.2215780210041881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}