{"id":"W2605199239","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2017.1292151","title":"Institutional arrangements for assessing and managing cumulative effects on watersheds: Lessons from the Grand River watershed, Ontario, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Watershed; Corporate governance; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Cumulative effects; Watershed management; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Business; Public administration; Geography; Economics; Finance; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006265551,0.0002950387,0.000307536,0.001255442,0.0168167,0.006086377,0.002669673,0.0009475545,0.002450596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107864,0.0004178878,0.0003426348,0.002763124,0.01118921,0.002055721,0.004130279,0.001612435,0.0001250656],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1627411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.300408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941344,0.001765248,0.0002127916,0.0004615013,0.002015114,0.001410899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893832,0.002806555,0.0006376041,0.0007527844,0.004558842,0.001860941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002148513,0.0004669658,0.1960182,0.0008472545,0.0001414104,0.005639781,0.1885239,0.0218762,0.006998105,0.223153,0.03403553,0.3220848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009212422,0.0001773351,0.3180864,0.001056902,0.0001318894,0.0004801959,0.2864316,0.00771198,0.002735571,0.03114753,0.3516506,0.0002980096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393465,0.004009628,0.02240521,0.04413885,0.000165127,0.001668168,0.0007576096,0.0002619246,0.1872469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966163,0.002261562,0.01859267,0.0007643943,0.00001700844,0.0001889513,0.0002319763,0.00004379167,0.01173667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1627411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02207366309034653,"score_gpt":0.2436516840945346,"score_spread":0.2215780210041881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}