{"id":"W2605732432","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915000190","title":"Power to the People? The Impacts and Outcomes of Energy Consultations in Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Legitimacy; Collaborative governance; Corporate governance; Public administration; Policy learning; Power (physics); Political science; Public policy; Public engagement; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Management; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001857111,0.00004397776,0.0001026033,0.0001508048,0.0002396219,0.0001020397,0.0002844555,0.00002173708,0.00002126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003069955,0.00002481599,0.00001664105,0.0005604135,0.001503408,0.0001628134,0.00001142939,0.0001134801,0.000001092235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005030687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6876147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989123,0.0001105864,0.000158597,0.00006465271,0.0002642537,0.0004895965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978521,0.0003140826,0.00002869226,0.00005972827,0.0001763006,0.001569064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002379104,0.000004760881,0.2622859,0.000001150193,0.000003847332,0.000004766691,0.1039495,0.00001633106,0.00004141357,0.6330886,0.000171886,0.000429403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001108998,0.00004198445,0.9489012,0.00001383805,0.00000445118,0.00001383813,0.04745886,0.000005716965,0.00001971409,0.002146348,0.001245098,0.00003806785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466362,0.00008239591,0.00006998618,0.0493184,0.0001055696,0.00003721713,0.0000060875,8.231386e-7,0.003743306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981114,0.000001639424,0.00004550932,0.001762445,0.00003507405,1.890454e-7,2.578384e-8,0.000001690069,0.00004207915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6866153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8924221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02405269403722177,"score_gpt":0.3245857691403713,"score_spread":0.3005330751031496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}