{"id":"W2605831918","doi":"10.1017/s000842391700004x","title":"Towards a More Collaborative Political Science: A Partnership Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Politics; Field (mathematics); Inclusion (mineral); Indigenous; Political science; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Engineering; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02264888,0.0001692966,0.000361455,0.001145713,0.002905242,0.003866099,0.004941815,0.00007433089,0.0005607567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03825085,0.0001135808,0.0001164427,0.001900147,0.01335043,0.002864126,0.0001687593,0.000389224,0.00009707036],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001532688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06556567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007272272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003507279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991317,0.0001416255,0.0008013531,0.0004929021,0.004753117,0.002494054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857433,0.0002587097,0.0004591212,0.0009437657,0.004576892,0.008018207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005880092,0.00001958502,0.02065922,0.000001715212,0.000002877045,0.00002832712,0.0007553209,0.00001323477,0.00009247816,0.9755443,0.000797976,0.002079071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004229826,0.0002099261,0.9124385,0.00002909526,0.00001470621,0.0001822532,0.009082395,0.004655329,0.001215408,0.06773202,0.003794473,0.0002228799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6765227,0.0000438949,0.001285066,0.04431976,0.001166073,0.0002194624,0.00003466581,0.000007265934,0.2764011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949946,5.803374e-7,0.002414206,0.001784511,0.0003425612,0.000003206069,2.490572e-7,0.000005571752,0.0004544735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2545015171666257,"score_gpt":0.5257059581158848,"score_spread":0.2712044409492591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}